en

Nassim Nicholas Taleb

  • Leonid Panichhar citeretfor 2 år siden
    Their three flaws: 1) they think in statics not dynamics, 2) they think in low, not high, dimensions, 3) they think in terms of actions, never interactions.
  • b6281743919har citeretfor 2 år siden
    If you have the rewards, you must also get some of the risks, not let others pay the price of your mistakes. If you inflict risk on others, and they are harmed, you need to pay some price for it. Just as you should treat others in the way you’d like to be treated, you would like to share the responsibility for events without unfairness and inequity.
  • b6281743919har citeretfor 2 år siden
    The same mechanism of transferring risk also impedes learning.
  • b6281743919har citeretfor 2 år siden
    You will never fully convince someone that he is wrong; only reality can
  • b6281743919har citeretfor 2 år siden
    There is no evolution without skin in the game.
  • b6281743919har citeretfor 2 år siden
    it is easier to know that something is wrong than to find the fix
  • b6281743919har citeretfor 2 år siden
    Those who talk should do and only those who do should talk
  • b6281743919har citeretfor 2 år siden
    The more you have to lose, the more fragile you are.
  • b6281743919har citeretfor 2 år siden
    What matters isn’t what a person has or doesn’t have; it is what he or she is afraid of losing.
  • b6281743919har citeretfor 2 år siden
    To make ethical choices you cannot have dilemmas between the particular (friends, family) and the general
fb2epub
Træk og slip dine filer (ikke mere end 5 ad gangen)