Murder on the Orient Express
- Udgivelsesår
- 2003
Vurderinger
- Victoria Zabielahar delt en vurderingfor 4 år siden
👍Værd at læseThe book is a good one to read and you get to found out who is the murderer or murderers.
- ;har delt en vurderingfor 7 år siden
👍Værd at læse🎯Læseværdig🚀OpslugendeIDK what to say.. There are too many suspects which at first were kinda confusing. Too many names to be remembered, too many evidences. As each suspect presented their alibis, my hypothesis also shifted. I guessed way too many suspects during the read LOL.
The way Poirot ended the case was rather amusing. He provided two solutions, in which one of them was actually meant to 'tease' the murderer, or I may say murderers. But then the very ending surprised me. In a good way.
To sum up, another masterpiece by Christie. A kinda long read, not really intense, but still enjoyable. - Shannon Tasker-Lynchhar delt en vurderingfor 3 år siden
First time reading a book of this genre, ahhhhh I must say I’ll be looking for more. So engagingly written.
Citater
- Grace Ningkan Galunghar citeretfor 6 år siden
Hardman’s evidence was necessary in case some outsider should be suspected of the crime and be unable to prove an alibi. - Sumi Ghar citeretfor 5 måneder siden
Instead of the usual formula, ‘Of so many people one is guilty,’ I was faced with the problem that of thirteen persons one and one only was innocent. Which was that person? - Sumi Ghar citeretfor 5 måneder siden“I saw it as a perfect mosaic, each person playing his or her allotted part. It was so arranged that if suspicion should fall on any one person, the evidence of one or more of the others would clear the accused person and confuse the issue.
